Posts
Shrink draws our attention to several items of interest.
Some authors still don't know that citing El Naschie makes them a laughing stock.
Here's a preprint from E. Hatir and N. Rajash (PDF).
Then there's this reprint from S.S. Ali, J. Jain, and A. Rajput (PDF). In it we learn that
[Intuitionistic Fuzzy Metric] has a concrete physical visualization in the context of two slit experiment as the foundation of E -infinity theory of high energy physics whose details are available in El Naschie in [12], [13], [14].
The arxiv.org editors filed Theory of the Elementary Particles (PDF) by E.L. Koschmieder not in the desirable hep-th but instead banished it to the "General Physics" garbage dump.
Blogger Tatsuo Tabata advises a boy of sixteen
I believe that the words "pseudoscientist crackpot" is quite true and do not recommend you to learn about his physics.
when asked about the Great Man's "golden physics".
Dulcis in fundo, the Curse of El Naschie has struck again, this time on Mohamed Mustafa's blog, where the late Boris Chirikov cannot defend himself from the humiliating accusation of having been El Naschie's "friend and teacher". Oh, the ignominy!
BTW: Happy 4th birthday! :)
ReplyDeleteThanks!
ReplyDeleteOh, the Great Man is also able to produce magnificent gif animations; check this one:
ReplyDeletehttp://4.bp.blogspot.com/-dVvm2CUqEN8/US3m_0x6zxI/AAAAAAAAAyA/Qj2s7HMxYQQ/s1600/egypt-12.gif
(from mohamed-elnaschie.blogspot.com)
This blog is moribund since the trial of the century?
ReplyDeleteHas ElN paid Nature's legal expenses yet?
Where is he?
Has a new article in vanity JQIS:
El Naschie works on entanglement now
While Jason isn't posting regularly, he's still keeping an eye on this blog and on Great Man's activities. If something important arises, he'll post about it. :)
ReplyDeleteWell, we had been wondering about the proof technique used for his crazy-ass 1/22 factor. Now, the paper cited in that link satisfies our curiosity -- he got it by multiplying Einstein's formula by some shit.
ReplyDeleteTo be fair, that paper does not contain a single self-citation, which represents significant progress.